Now that we know a few basic commands,
we can finally look at the shell's most powerful feature:
the ease with which it lets us combine existing programs in new ways.
We'll start with a directory called molecules
that contains six files describing some simple organic molecules.
The .pdb
extension indicates that these files are in Protein Data Bank format,
a simple text format that specifies the type and position of each atom in the molecule.
$ ls molecules
cubane.pdb ethane.pdb methane.pdb
octane.pdb pentane.pdb propane.pdb
Let's go into that directory with cd
and run the command wc *.pdb
.
wc
is the "word count" command:
it counts the number of lines, words, and characters in files.
The *
in *.pdb
matches zero or more characters,
so the shell turns *.pdb
into a complete list of .pdb
files:
$ cd molecules
$ wc *.pdb
20 156 1158 cubane.pdb
12 84 622 ethane.pdb
9 57 422 methane.pdb
30 246 1828 octane.pdb
21 165 1226 pentane.pdb
15 111 825 propane.pdb
107 819 6081 total
Wildcards
*
is a wildcard. It matches zero or more characters, so*.pdb
matchesethane.pdb
,propane.pdb
, and so on. On the other hand,p*.pdb
only matchespentane.pdb
andpropane.pdb
, because the 'p' at the front only matches itself.
?
is also a wildcard, but it only matches a single character. This means thatp?.pdb
matchespi.pdb
orp5.pdb
, but notpropane.pdb
. We can use any number of wildcards at a time: for example,p*.p?*
matches anything that starts with a 'p' and ends with '.', 'p', and at least one more character (since the '?' has to match one character, and the final '*' can match any number of characters). Thus,p*.p?*
would matchpreferred.practice
, and evenp.pi
(since the first '*' can match no characters at all), but notquality.practice
(doesn't start with 'p') orpreferred.p
(there isn't at least one character after the '.p').When the shell sees a wildcard, it expands it to create a list of matching filenames before running the command that was asked for. This means that commands like
wc
andls
never see the wildcard characters, just what those wildcards matched. This is another example of orthogonal design.
If we run wc -l
instead of just wc
,
the output shows only the number of lines per file:
$ wc -l *.pdb
20 cubane.pdb
12 ethane.pdb
9 methane.pdb
30 octane.pdb
21 pentane.pdb
15 propane.pdb
107 total
We can also use -w
to get only the number of words,
or -c
to get only the number of characters.
Which of these files is shortest? It's an easy question to answer when there are only six files, but what if there were 6000? Our first step toward a solution is to run the command:
$ wc -l *.pdb > lengths
The >
tells the shell to redirect the command's output
to a file instead of printing it to the screen.
The shell will create the file if it doesn't exist,
or overwrite the contents of that file if it does.
(This is why there is no screen output:
everything that wc
would have printed has gone into the file lengths
instead.)
ls lengths
confirms that the file exists:
$ ls lengths
lengths
We can now send the content of lengths
to the screen using cat lengths
.
cat
stands for "concatenate":
it prints the contents of files one after another.
There's only one file in this case,
so cat
just shows us what it contains:
$ cat lengths
20 cubane.pdb
12 ethane.pdb
9 methane.pdb
30 octane.pdb
21 pentane.pdb
15 propane.pdb
107 total
Now let's use the sort
command to sort its contents.
This does not change the file;
instead, it sends the sorted result to the screen:
$ sort lengths
9 methane.pdb
12 ethane.pdb
15 propane.pdb
20 cubane.pdb
21 pentane.pdb
30 octane.pdb
107 total
We can put the sorted list of lines in another temporary file called sorted-lengths
by putting > sorted-lengths
after the command,
just as we used > lengths
to put the output of wc
into lengths
.
Once we've done that,
we can run another command called head
to get the first few lines in sorted-lengths
:
$ sort lengths > sorted-lengths
$ head -1 sorted-lengths
9 methane.pdb
Using the parameter -1
with head
tells it that
we only want the first line of the file;
-20
would get the first 20,
and so on.
Since sorted-lengths
contains the lengths of our files ordered from least to greatest,
the output of head
must be the file with the fewest lines.
If you think this is confusing,
you're in good company:
even once you understand what wc
, sort
, and head
do,
all those intermediate files make it hard to follow what's going on.
We can make it easier to understand by running sort
and head
together:
$ sort lengths | head -1
9 methane.pdb
The vertical bar between the two commands is called a pipe. It tells the shell that we want to use the output of the command on the left as the input to the command on the right. The computer might create a temporary file if it needs to, or copy data from one program to the other in memory, or something else entirely; we don't have to know or care.
We can use another pipe to send the output of wc
directly to sort
,
which then sends its output to head
:
$ wc -l *.pdb | sort | head -1
9 methane.pdb
This is exactly like a mathematician nesting functions like sin(πx)2
and saying "the square of the sine of x times π".
In our case,
the calculation is "head of sort of word count of *.pdb
".
Here's what actually happens behind the scenes when we create a pipe. When a computer runs a program—any program—it creates a process in memory to hold the program's software and its current state. Every process has an input channel called standard input. (By this point, you may be surprised that the name is so memorable, but don't worry: most Unix programmers call it "stdin". Every process also has a default output channel called standard output (or "stdout").
The shell is just another program, and runs in a process like any other. Under normal circumstances, whatever we type on the keyboard is sent to the shell on its standard input, and whatever it produces on standard output is displayed on our screen. When we tell the shell to run a program, it creates a new process and temporarily sends whatever we type on our keyboard to that process's standard input, and whatever the process sends to standard output to the screen.
Here's what happens when we run wc -l *.pdb > lengths
.
The shell starts by telling the computer to create a new process to run the wc
program.
Since we've provided some filenames as parameters,
wc
reads from them instead of from standard input.
And since we've used >
to redirect output to a file,
the shell connects the process's standard output to that file.
If we run wc -l *.pdb | sort
instead,
the shell creates two processes
(one for each process in the pipe)
so that wc
and sort
run simultaneously.
The standard output of wc
is fed directly to the standard input of sort
;
since there's no redirection with >
,
sort
's output goes to the screen.
And if we run wc -l *.pdb | sort | head -1
,
we get three processes with data flowing from the files,
through wc
to sort
,
and from sort
through head
to the screen.
This simple idea is why Unix has been so successful. Instead of creating enormous programs that try to do many different things, Unix programmers focus on creating lots of simple tools that each do one job well, and that work well with each other. This programming model is called pipes and filters. We've already seen pipes; a filter is a program that transforms a stream of input into a stream of output. Almost all of the standard Unix tools can work this way: unless told to do otherwise, they read from standard input, do something with what they've read, and write to standard output.
The key is that any program that reads lines of text from standard input and writes lines of text to standard output can be combined with every other program that behaves this way as well. You can and should write your programs this way so that you and other people can put those programs into pipes to multiply their power.
Redirecting Input
As well as using
>
to redirect a program's output, we can use<
to redirect its input, i.e., to read from a file instead of from standard input. For example, instead of writingwc ammonia.pdb
, we could writewc < ammonia.pdb
. In the first case,wc
gets a command line parameter telling it what file to open. In the second,wc
doesn't have any command line parameters, so it reads from standard input, but we have told the shell to send the contents ofammonia.pdb
towc
's standard input.
Nelle has run her samples through the assay machines
and created 1520 files in the north-pacific-gyre/2012-07-03
directory described earlier.
As a quick sanity check, she types:
$ cd north-pacific-gyre/2012-07-03
$ wc -l *.txt
The output is 1520 lines that look like this:
300 NENE01729A.txt
300 NENE01729B.txt
300 NENE01736A.txt
300 NENE01751A.txt
300 NENE01751B.txt
300 NENE01812A.txt
... ...
Now she types this:
$ wc -l *.txt | sort | head -5
240 NENE02018B.txt
300 NENE01729A.txt
300 NENE01729B.txt
300 NENE01736A.txt
300 NENE01751A.txt
Whoops: one of the files is 60 lines shorter than the others. When she goes back and checks it, she sees that she did that assay at 8:00 on a Monday morning—someone was probably in using the machine on the weekend, and she forgot to reset it. Before re-running that sample, she checks to see if any files have too much data:
$ wc -l *.txt | sort | tail -5
300 NENE02040A.txt
300 NENE02040B.txt
300 NENE02040Z.txt
300 NENE02043A.txt
300 NENE02043B.txt
Those numbers look good—but what's that 'Z' doing there in the third-to-last line? All of her samples should be marked 'A' or 'B'; by convention, her lab uses 'Z' to indicate samples with missing information. To find others like it, she does this:
$ ls *Z.txt
NENE01971Z.txt NENE02040Z.txt
Sure enough,
when she checks the log on her laptop,
there's no depth recorded for either of those samples.
Since it's too late to get the information any other way,
she must exclude those two files from her analysis.
She could just delete them using rm
,
but there are actually some analyses she might do later where depth doesn't matter,
so instead, she'll just be careful later on to select files using the wildcard expression *[AB].txt
.
As always,
the '*' matches any number of characters;
the expression [AB]
matches either an 'A' or a 'B',
so this matches all the valid data files she has.
command > file
redirects a command's output to a file.first | second
is a pipeline: the output of the first command is used as the input to the second.cat
displays the contents of its inputs.head
displays the first few lines of its input.sort
sorts its inputs.tail
displays the last few lines of its input.wc
counts lines, words, and characters in its inputs.sort
on each of the files shown on the left in the table
below, without the -n
flag, the output is as shown on the right.
Explain why we get different answers for the two files.1 10 2 19 22 6 |
1 10 19 2 22 6 |
1 10 2 19 22 6 |
1 2 6 10 19 22 |
What is the difference between:
wc -l < mydata.dat
and:
wc -l mydata.dat
The command uniq
removes adjacent duplicated lines from its input.
For example, if a file salmon.txt
contains:
coho
coho
steelhead
coho
steelhead
steelhead
then uniq salmon.txt
produces:
coho
steelhead
coho
steelhead
Why do you think uniq
only removes adjacent duplicated lines?
(Hint: think about very large data sets.) What other command could
you combine with it in a pipe to remove all duplicated lines?
A file called animals.txt
contains the following data:
2012-11-05,deer
2012-11-05,rabbit
2012-11-05,raccoon
2012-11-06,rabbit
2012-11-06,deer
2012-11-06,fox
2012-11-07,rabbit
2012-11-07,bear
Fill in the table showing what lines of text pass through each pipe in the pipeline below.
cat animals.txt |
| |
head -5 |
| |
tail -3 |
| |
sort -r |
> |
final.txt |
The command:
$ cut -d , -f 2 animals.txt
produces the following output:
deer
rabbit
raccoon
rabbit
deer
fox
rabbit
bear
What other command(s) could be added to this in a pipeline to find out what animals have been seen (without any duplicates in the animals' names)?